SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAM ASHREY AND 7 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA AND 12 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 10

Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 31 of 2022

Revisionist :- Ram Ashrey And 7 Others

Opposite Party :- Vijay Kumar Gupta And 12 Others

Counsel for Revisionist :- Vijay Anand Rai,Krishna Nand Rai

Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

Heard learned counsel for the revisionists.

This is defendants' revision filed under Section 115 of the CPC

against the judgment and order dated 03.12.2021 passed by

Civil Judge (Senior Judge), Ballia on the application filed by

the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 in Original Suit No.60058

of 2017, whereby the amendment application of the plaintiff

was allowed by the Court below.

Learned counsel for the revisionists submitted that the suit for

specific performance was filed by the plaintiff. By the proposed

amendment, the plaintiffs had tried to introduce a case for

cancellation of sale deed and also sought relief of injunction.

He submitted that the Court below was not justified in allowing

the proposed amendment of the plaintiffs.

I have heard learned counsel for the revisionists and perused the

material on record.

It is not in dispute that the amendment application moved by

the plaintiffs was allowed by the Court below for amending the

plaint so

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top