SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SHIVBARAN @ SHIV KUSHWAHA @ MATOLE – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['PANDEY BALKRISHNA', '', 'SATISH KUMAR SHUKLA', 'G A']

Court No. - 83

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9732 of 2022

Applicant :- Shivbaran @ Shiv Kushwaha @ Matole

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And 2 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Pandey Balkrishna,Satish Kumar

Shukla

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.

Heard Mr. Satish Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the

applicant and Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, learned AGA for the

State.

This application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant

with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 03.03.2022

passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court

No.2, Kanpur Nagar in Case No.419 of 2019 (Neha vs.

Shivbaran @ Shiv Kushwaha @ Matole) CNR

No.UPKN020014822019, under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.

On 29.07.2022, the following order was passed:-

"Earlier the application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. No.6453 of 2021 was filed, in

which, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 12.03.2021

while giving the protection to the applicant passed the following order:-

"The Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.2, Kanpur

Nagar, vide ex parte judgment and order dated 06.02.2020, passed in

Case No.416 of 2019, Smt. Neha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top