SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
KAMLESH PARIHAR – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['DHIRESH KUMAR', '', 'RAGHAVENDRA PATI TRIPATHI', 'G A', '', 'ARUN KUMAR SINGH']

Court No. - 71

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15942 of 2022

Applicant :- Kamlesh Parihar

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Dhiresh Kumar,Raghavendra Pati Tripathi

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arun Kumar Singh

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned Additional Government

Advocate appearing on behalf of State and perused the record.

2. This first bail application has been filed with regard to Case Crime

No.434 of 2021, under Sections 376, 354Ga, 387, 506 IPC and Section 66-

E Information of Technology Act, registered at Police Station Nawabad,

District Jhansi.

3. As per contents of FIR, the applicant and the informant were in a

consensual relationship whereafter the applicant started demanding a sum

of Rs.5,00,000/- with the threat of making public obscene photographs and

videos of the informant. It is stated that such obscene videos and photos

were in fact sent to the mobile phone of the father and brother of the

informant.

4. Learned counsel for applicant submits that the applicant has been

falsely implicated in the charges levelled against him and even as per FIR

as well as statements of pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top