SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD AKRAM – Appellant
Versus
KAUSHALYA AND 17 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 5

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2879 of 2022

Petitioner :- Mohammad Akram

Respondent :- Kaushalya And 17 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Pandey

Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner has come up in the present petition with a sole

prayer that a direction be issued to Civil Judge (Junior

Division), Jaunpur to decide the Injunction Application 6C filed

in Civil Suit No.250 of 2022 (Mohd. Akram Vs. Kaushalya)

pending before it expeditiously within a time bound period.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without

adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is

disposed off with a direction to Civil Judge (Junior Division),

Jaunpur to decide the Injunction Application 6C filed in Civil

Suit No.250 of 2022 (Mohd. Akram Vs. Kaushalya) pending

before it expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months

from the date of production of certified copy of this order

without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the

parties.

In case if any adjournment is inevitable, the authority concerned

may grant the same by imposing heavy cost which may not be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top