SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SMT. KUSUM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 32

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6061 of 2022

Petitioner :- Smt. Kusum Singh

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Singh

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has approached this court praying for

quashing the impugned order dated 26.3.2022

passed by the respondent no.3, Deputy Director of

Education, VIIth Region, District Gorakhpur which

he has been denied the old pension on the ground

that petitioner has not deposited the managerial

contribution along with interest

as per

Government Order dated 28.1.2004.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

that aforesaid Government Order has already been

quashed in the cases of Mangali Prasad Varma

Vs. State of U.P. and others in Writ-A No.

17819 of 2007 and Special Appeal (D) No.228

of 2016 , State of U.P. & others vs. Sri

Krishna Prasad Yadav and others dated

24.5.2017 and Special Appeal (D) No. 678 of

2013, State of U.P. and others Vs.Mangali

Prasad Varma(8) ADJ 680 (DB) . The impugned

order has been passed again on t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top