SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MAMMON CONCAST PRIVATE LIMITED AND 4 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['MAHESH CHANDRA TIWARI', '', 'KIRAN TIWARI', 'G A']

Court No. - 79

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11439 of 2020

Applicant :- Mammon Concast Private Limited And 4 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Mahesh Chandra Tiwari,Kiran Tiwari

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vivek Rastogi,

learned AGA for the State.

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the

proceeding of complaint Case No. 28 of 2019, Registrar of

Companies Vs. Mammon Concast Private Limited and others,

u/s 266-F of Companies Act, 1956, P.S. Kamla Nagar, District

Agra pending in the court of Special C.J.M., Agra as well as the

summoning order dated 20.2.2019.

Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the impugned

summoning order dated 20.02.2019 is a sketchy and cryptic

order. He further submits that the court below while summoning

the applicants has materially erred and did not follow the

dictum of law as propounded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

various cases that summoning in criminal case is a serious

matter and the court below without dwelling into material and

visualizing the case on the touch stone of probability sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top