SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJAN VISHWAKARMA – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 67

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17968 of 2022

Applicant :- Rajan Vishwakarma

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And 3 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Lok Nath Shukla

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant Shri Lok Nath Shukla

and learned A.G.A. Perused the record.

Pursuant to order dated 6.7.2022 notices were issued to

opposite party no.2 as the matter related to Section 3/4 of

POCSO Act. After service of notice, a compliance report has

been filed by Praveen Kumar Kashyap, Sub Inspector of Police

Station Harpur Godhat, District Gorakhpur, mentioning therein

that the efforts were made to serve the notices upon the

informant Munni Devi. It is alleged that annexing the copy of

bail application the I.O. of the case has tried to serve the copy

of bail application upon the opposite party no.2 informant but

the report of C.J.M., Gorakhpur indicates that the informant left

her native place and went to some unknown place at Delhi

without any address, therefore, no notice could be served upon

opposite party no.2.

The applicant is facing prosecution in Case Crime No.123 of

2021, u/s 376

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top