SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SMT. NIRMALA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['PRAVEEN KUMAR SINGH', '', 'ANURAG VAJPEYI', 'G A', '', 'BAIRISTER SINGH']

Court No. - 1

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S

438 CR.P.C. No. - 9820 of 2021

Applicant :- Smt. Nirmala Devi

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Singh,Anurag Vajpeyi

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bairister Singh

Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.

1. Heard Sri Anurag Vajpeyi, learned counsel for the applicant-

Nirmala Devi, Sri Bairister Singh, learned counsel for the informant

and Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assited by

Sri Nagendra Srivastava for the State.

2. Applicant is aggrieved by order dated 15.03.2021 passed in

Anticipatory Bail Application No.927 of 2021 by learned Special

Judge (POCSO Act), Varanasi on the ground that applicant is a

bonofide purchaser of the land contained in Arazi No.906/2

measuring 0.139 hectares and this land was purchased from one

Prem Narain by registered sale deed dated 25.06.2018, and the

allegation on the applicant is that she fraudulently changed the

boundaries of the property and purchased property in excess of the

share of Prem Narain.

3. From the perusal of the FIR, it appears that complainant-Ramesh

Kumar Patel has alleged that Prem Narain had sold land bel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top