SMT. NIRMALA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S
438 CR.P.C. No. - 9820 of 2021
Applicant :- Smt. Nirmala Devi
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Singh,Anurag Vajpeyi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bairister Singh
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Anurag Vajpeyi, learned counsel for the applicant-
Nirmala Devi, Sri Bairister Singh, learned counsel for the informant
and Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assited by
Sri Nagendra Srivastava for the State.
2. Applicant is aggrieved by order dated 15.03.2021 passed in
Anticipatory Bail Application No.927 of 2021 by learned Special
Judge (POCSO Act), Varanasi on the ground that applicant is a
bonofide purchaser of the land contained in Arazi No.906/2
measuring 0.139 hectares and this land was purchased from one
Prem Narain by registered sale deed dated 25.06.2018, and the
allegation on the applicant is that she fraudulently changed the
boundaries of the property and purchased property in excess of the
share of Prem Narain.
3. From the perusal of the FIR, it appears that complainant-Ramesh
Kumar Patel has alleged that Prem Narain had sold land bel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.