SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
,
ADITYA PRATAP SINGH AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
SIMMI TAHEJA AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 2

Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 197 of

2022

Applicant :- Aditya Pratap Singh And 3 Others

Opposite Party :- Simmi Taheja And 2 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Manish Kumar Nigam,Praveen Kumar

Srivastava

Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.

Hon'ble Ajai Tyagi,J.

This review application was kept for clarification and we are

thankful to Sri Arvind Kumar Singh, learned Advocate who has

brought in our notice that there was an error apparent on the

face of record. In paragraph 10 of the judgment dated 5.3.2022

passed in FAFO No.1555 of 2014 which will stand reviewed.

As far as calculations are concerned, learned counsel has

conveyed to the Court that he has no grievance about the same.

This Court has fallen in error in not granting the difference of

the amount not granted by the Tribunal on the ground that the

claimants had claimed only Rs.40,00,000/- in their claim

petition and, therefore, the Tribunal could not award more than

what is claimed this finding of Tribunal was itself fallacious

and against the mandate of Apex Court. The Apex Court way

back in the year 2003 in the case of Naga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top