SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MOHIT YADAV – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['R P RAJAN', '', 'SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV', 'G A', '', 'PRAVIN KUMAR MISHRA']

Court No. - 77

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. -

19917 of 2022

Applicant :- Mohit Yadav

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- R P Rajan,Shailendra Kumar

Yadav

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pravin Kumar

Mishra

Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel

for the first informant, learned A.G.A. and perused the

record.

The bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been

moved by the applicant - Mohit Yadav to enlarge him on

bail in Case Crime No. 524 of 2021 under Section 302

I.P.C. Police Station Shivpur, District Varanasi.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that

the FIR is ante time. In the inquest report, the inquest is

shown to be started at 7.00 p.m., there is over writing in

time 18.15 the time of lodging FIR. Moreover, this inquest

report does not bear case crime number, sections and name

of the accused persons. It is not clear from the FIR that

who, among the accused persons caused the injuries to the

deceased. No one witnessed the incident, which took place

inside the room. The version of the FIR, inquest report and

statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. of the appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top