SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJNISH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAMDHAN', '', 'SURESH KUMAR', 'C S C', '', 'SMT ALPANA TIWARI', 'K R SINGH', 'ASHOK KUMAR', 'RAHUL AGARWAL']

Court No. - 39

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13121 of 2022

Petitioner :- Rajnish Kumar

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramdhan,Suresh Kumar

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar,K.R.

Singh,Rahul Agarwal,Smt Alpana Tiwari

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.

Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.

By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India, the petitioner has sought a restraint on the installation

of Jio Mobile Tower at Mohalla Vijay Nagar, Post Office

Basaratpur, Police Station Chiluatal, District Gorakhpur. A

direction to the respondent no. 2, the District Magistrate,

Gorakhpur to decide the representation dated 17.3.2022 filed by

the petitioner is also sought simultaneously.

The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that

the respondent no. 5 Reliance Jio India is going to install Jio

Mobile Tower in the aforesaid mohalla of the petitioner which

is high densely populated area. The radiation which emits from

the tower is dangerous for children and old age persons of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top