SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
STATE OF U.P. and OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
SRI PADAM SINGH and OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 38

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10513 of 2001

Petitioner :- State Of U.P. And Others

Respondent :- Sri Padam Singh And Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- S.C.,C.S.C.

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,M.I.Khan,S.S.Upadhyay,Smt.Sadhana Upadhyay

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

1. Heard Ms. Archana Tyagi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Mr.

Prathmesh Upadhyay, Advocate, holding brief of Ms. Sadhana Upadhyay,

learned counsel for respondent Corporation.

2. Present writ petition is directed against the award of the Labour Court,

Azamgarh, dated 18.2.2000 in Adjudication Case No. 413 of 1993.

3. The above adjudication case had arisen from the following reference made,

vide order dated 29.4.93:

"Kya Sewayojakon Dwara Shri Padam Singh Putra Shri Badan Singh Ki Sewayein Dinaak

4.8.92 Se Samampt Kiya Jaana Uchit Evam Vaidhanik Hai? Yadi Nahin Toh Shramik Kis

Upshram/Chhatipurti Paane Ka Adhikari Hai Tatha Kis Vivaran Sahit?"

4. By a detailed order of the date (27.5.2022), Writ-C No. 10510 of 2001 (State

of U.P. & Ors. vs. Sri Jagdish & Ors.) has been partly allowed. For the same

facts and reasoning and to the same extent, the present petition is also partly

allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top