SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
STATE OF U.P – Appellant
Versus
AKBAR ALI AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['S C', 'C S C', '', 'V P PANDEY', 'SURESH CHANDRA MISHRA', 'SATYA PRAKASH PANDEY']

Court No. - 38

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2162 of 2001

Petitioner :- State of U.P.

Respondent :- Akbar Ali And Anr.

Counsel for Petitioner :- S.C.

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satya Prakash Pandey,Suresh Chandra

Mishra,V.P. Pandey

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

1. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri

V.P. Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent claimant.

2. Present writ petition has been filed against the order

dated 15.03.2000 passed by the Labour Court, Agra

under Section 33-C(2) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). By that order,

the petitioner has been directed to pay Rs. 96,206/- to the

respondent workman by way of arrears of wages (Rs.

6,329/-), leave encashment (Rs. 16,567/-), bonus (Rs.

6,570/-) and overtime (Rs. 66,740/-). Under the interim

order granted by this Court dated 18.01.2001, the entire

disputed amount was directed to be deposited with the

Labour Court. Of that 50% was required to be released in

favour of respondent workman.

3. Learned Standing Counsel would submit, the order

dated 15.03.2000 is based on a fraudulent award dated

10.09.1997 passed in Adjudication Case No. 1 of 1995.

S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top