ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
NIDHI BANSAL AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 84
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 333 of 2022
Petitioner :- Nidhi Bansal And 2 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shubham Prakash Gupta,Mukesh Chandra
Gupta
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ashwini Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Counter affidavit on behalf of respondents no.4,5 and 6
filed today, is taken on record.
Heard Sri Shubham Prakash Gupta, learned counsel for the
applicants, Sri Ashwini Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel
for opposite party no.2, Sri Jhamman Ram, learned AGA,
for the State, and perused the record of the case.
On 2.6.2022 following order was passed:
" Heard Sri Mukesh Chandra Gupta, learned counsel for
the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused
the record.
This is habeas corpus writ petition on behalf of petitioner
no.3- Nitin Bansal, husband of petitioner no.1- Smt. Nidhi
Bansal claiming to be his wife and father of petitioner
no.2- Km. Vedika Bansal claiming to be his daughter.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner no.1 is a major lady and petitioner no.3 (her
husband) is also major. He further submitted that the
petitioner nos. 1 a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.