SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
NIDHI BANSAL AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHUBHAM PRAKASH GUPTA', '', 'MUKESH CHANDRA GUPTA', 'G A', '', 'ASHWINI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA']

Court No. - 84

Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 333 of 2022

Petitioner :- Nidhi Bansal And 2 Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Shubham Prakash Gupta,Mukesh Chandra

Gupta

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ashwini Kumar Srivastava

Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.

Counter affidavit on behalf of respondents no.4,5 and 6

filed today, is taken on record.

Heard Sri Shubham Prakash Gupta, learned counsel for the

applicants, Sri Ashwini Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel

for opposite party no.2, Sri Jhamman Ram, learned AGA,

for the State, and perused the record of the case.

On 2.6.2022 following order was passed:

" Heard Sri Mukesh Chandra Gupta, learned counsel for

the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused

the record.

This is habeas corpus writ petition on behalf of petitioner

no.3- Nitin Bansal, husband of petitioner no.1- Smt. Nidhi

Bansal claiming to be his wife and father of petitioner

no.2- Km. Vedika Bansal claiming to be his daughter.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner no.1 is a major lady and petitioner no.3 (her

husband) is also major. He further submitted that the

petitioner nos. 1 a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top