SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['RANJEET KUMAR MISHRA', '', 'PRABHAV SRIVASTAVA', 'C S C']

Court No. - 38

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13821 of 2019

Petitioner :- Raj Kumar

Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Ranjeet Kumar Mishra,Prabhav Srivastava

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

1. Heard Sri Prabhav Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri

Avdhesh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. Challenge has been raised to the communication dated 27.11.2018

issued by Assistant Labour Commissioner, Kanpur whereby the said

authority has made the following observations regarding compliance of

award passed in favour of the petitioner.

"Uukt ke sambandh mai apko suchit kia jata hai ki ap award mai diye

gaye nidhnaye ke anusar yadi wadi shramik se kanishth karmchari

karyarat hai to wadi ko bhi karya par lene hetu vichar kare tatha ukt se 15

din ke andar adhyohastakshari ko bhi avgat karaye."

3. In short, the dispute was referred for adjudication, at the instance of the

present petitioner, to the Labour Court Kanpur in Adjudication Case

No.342 of 2006. Thereby the following dispute was referred :

"Kya sevayojakon dwara apne shramik Sri Raj Kumar putra Sri

Dilasharam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top