SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
HEM PUSHPA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 35

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13934 of 2022

Petitioner :- Hem Pushpa

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Kushwaha

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing

Counsel for the State respondents.

By means of this petition, petitioner has prayed for rechecking

of the answer copy of the petitioner in the subject of 'General

Hindi' and 'English' of Class-XII Examination, 2021.

Learned Standing Counsel submits that petitioner had already

applied for the answer copies under the Right to Information

Act, 2005 and she was directed to peruse those answer copies

by the order/letter issued by the Information Officer dated

04.01.2022.

In view of the above, petitioner states that petitioner has already

perused the answer copies on the date fixed by the Information

Officer. However, she is not satisfied and, therefore, she wants

reevaluation.

In the considered view of the Court, since there is no provision

for re-evaluation or challenged evaluation under the Rules

framed by the U.P. Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, Prayagraj. No

relief as such, can be given to the petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top