SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
IBNE – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['SANJAY MISHRA', '', 'ASHOK KUMAR NIGAM', 'DIVYA JYOTI PANDEY', 'G A', '', 'SUNIL KUMAR DUBEY', 'SAURABH CHATURVEDI']

Court No. - 77

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. -

20383 of 2022

Applicant :- Ibne

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Mishra,Ashok Kumar

Nigam,Divya Jyoti Pandey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Saurabh

Chaturvedi,Sunil Kumar Dubey

Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel

for the first informant, learned A.G.A. and perused the

record.

The bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been

moved by the applicant - Ibne to enlarge him on bail in

Case Crime No. 304 of 2018 under Sections 147, 148, 149,

323, 504, 506, 120B, 302, 341 I.P.C. and 7 C.L.A. Act,

Police Station Shivkuti, District Prayagraj.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that

as per FIR general role is assigned to all the accused

persons to assault with lathi, danda and pistol, while no

injury of fire arm was found on the person of the deceased,

though, 15 injuries are found on the person of the

deceased. The cause of death is shock and haemorrhage

due to antemortem injuries. Only injury no. 1, which is on

the skull of the deceased, can be attributed to his death. It

is not clear that who is t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top