ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
NAVEEN SRIVASTAVA
RAHUL YADAV (JUVENILE) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER – Respondent
Court No. - 81
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2126 of 2020
Revisionist :- Rahul Yadav (Juvenile)
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Revisionist :- Sushil Dubey
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Naveen Srivastava,J.
List revised.
Learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. are
present.
No one appears on behalf of opposite party no.2.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A.
This revision has been filed against the judgment and order
dated 03.06.2020, passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special
Judge (Exclusive POCSO Court), Mainpuri in Criminal Appeal
No. 3 of 2020, which was preferred against the order dated
14.02.2020, passed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice
Board, Mainpuri rejecting the bail application of the revisionist.
The appeal filed against the same has been also dismissed by
the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Exclusive
POCSO Court), Mainpuri by the impugned order.
The FIR was registered by the mother of the victim against the
revisionist Rahul (minor) in respect of incident dated
02.10.2019 on 03.10.2019 for the offence Under Section 376
(A,B) I.P.C. and 5/6 POCSO Act
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.