SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
NAVEEN SRIVASTAVA
RAHUL YADAV (JUVENILE) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Court No. - 81

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2126 of 2020

Revisionist :- Rahul Yadav (Juvenile)

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Revisionist :- Sushil Dubey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Naveen Srivastava,J.

List revised.

Learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. are

present.

No one appears on behalf of opposite party no.2.

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A.

This revision has been filed against the judgment and order

dated 03.06.2020, passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special

Judge (Exclusive POCSO Court), Mainpuri in Criminal Appeal

No. 3 of 2020, which was preferred against the order dated

14.02.2020, passed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice

Board, Mainpuri rejecting the bail application of the revisionist.

The appeal filed against the same has been also dismissed by

the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Exclusive

POCSO Court), Mainpuri by the impugned order.

The FIR was registered by the mother of the victim against the

revisionist Rahul (minor) in respect of incident dated

02.10.2019 on 03.10.2019 for the offence Under Section 376

(A,B) I.P.C. and 5/6 POCSO Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top