SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VINOD AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


A.F.R.

Court No. - 88

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13840 of 2022

Applicant :- Vinod And 2 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Kumar

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arun Kumar Tripathi

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.

1-Heard Mr. Pawan Kumar, learned counsel for the

applicants, Mr. Arun Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for

the complainant/opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A.

for the State.

2-By means of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,

the applicants have made a prayer for quashing the

impugned charge-sheet dated 4.6.2020 and summoning

order dated 16.9.2020 in Criminal Case No. 3297 of 2020

arising out of Case Crime No. 106 of 2020 (State Vs.

Vinod & Others) under Sections 323, 504, 506, 325, 308

I.P.C. pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Maharajganj.

3-At the out-set on the matter being taken up, learned

counsel for the complainant / opposite party no. 2 raises

preliminary objection that the applicants have not come

with clean hands before this Court as the averment made

in paragraph no.2 of the affidavit filed in support of this

application "that this is the first application on beha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top