SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PRADEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA', '', 'RAJIV SISODIA', 'SANGAM LAL KESHARWANI', 'ATUL KUMAR', 'G A']

Court No. - 69

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21986

of 2020

Applicant :- Pradeep

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava,Atul

Kumar,Rajiv Sisodia,Sangam Lal Kesharwani

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.

1. Heard Sri Atul Kumar, learned counsel for applicant and

learned A.G.A. for State.

2. Applicant-Pradeep, has approached this Court by way of

filing the present Criminal Misc. Bail Application under Section

439 Cr.P.C. after rejection of his Bail Application vide order

dated 19.02.2020, passed by Sessions Judge, Muzaffar Nagar,

in Case Crime No.625 of 2019, Session Trial No. 29 of 2020,

under Sections 498A, 304B, 323 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry

Prohibition Act, Police Station Civil Lines, District Muzaffar

Nagar.

3. Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant is

related as husband of deceased and this was the second

marriage between parties and both have children from their first

marriage. Learned counsel further submits that all the witnesses

of fact, i.e., PW-1, Informant; PW-2, maternal uncle; and, PW-

3, real brother of deceased, have not supported the case o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top