ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
RAHUL DWIVEDI AND 4 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14057 of 2021
Petitioner :- Rahul Dwivedi And 4 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 16 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Singh Sengar
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhishek Rai,Azad
Rai,Chandan Sharma,Rajesh Kumar Nishad
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard Sri Shyam Singh Sengar, learned counsel for the
petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1
and 2, Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3,
Sri Abhishek Rai, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 5 to 9
and Sri Rajesh Kumar Nishad, learned counsel for the
respondents.
This writ petition arises out of proceedings under Section 33/39
of the L.R. Act. Petitioners have challenged the order dated
07.04.2021 passed by the respondent no. 2 in Case No.
RST/151/1984-85 (Ramkishore Vs. Balkrishna) filed under
Section 219 of L.R. Act, 1901.
On the matter being taken up today, learned Standing Counsel
has raised a preliminary objection in regard to maintainability
of writ petition by submitting that no writ petition lies against
summary proceedings and in the present case proceedings had
been contested by the petitioners t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.