SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
,
BHULLAN MAURYA @ BHULLAN PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 39

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15588 of 2022

Petitioner :- Bhullan Maurya @ Bhullan Prasad

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammed Iftekhar,Mohammad

Hisham Qadeer

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.

Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.

The petitioner herein seeks to issue direction to the respondent

nos. 2 to 5 namely, the administrative authorities of District

Prayagraj, to remove the illegal encroachment made by the

respondent nos. 6 to 7 over the public passage in-front of the

door of the house of the petitioner. The area is village Baramau.

Referring to a report dated 05.02.2022, it is stated that in the

spot inspection report submitted by the Revenue Inspector it

was found that the respondent nos. 6 to 9 had blocked the

public pathway by raising the constructions of charahi. It is

stated that the said illegal constructions are to be removed by

the respondents in order to restore the public land. The Gaon

Sabha, which is the owner of the public pathway/public land in

the village, has not been impleaded herein and as such their

stand could not be obtained. Even otherwise, Section 67 of the

Uttar Pradesh Re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top