SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SARITA DEVI AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 44

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5145 of

2021

Petitioner :- Sarita Devi And 2 Others

Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Verma

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.

Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for

the State-respondent.

By means of the present petition, the petitioners are seeking

quashing of the first information report dated 17.06.2021

registered as Case Crime No.0156 of 2021, under Sections 363,

366, 354, 120-B I.P.C., P.S.- Machhalishahar, District- Jaunpur.

In none of the paragraphs of the writ petition, the petitioners

disclose whereabouts of the victim/ girl though during the

course of the argument, it is stated by the learned counsel for

the petitioners that the victim/girl is with the petitioner no.3.

The victim/ girl has not joined the petitioners herein in the

present petition. It is, though, stated that the victim/ girl is

major based on the averment made in the F.I.R. but there is no

age proof of the girl.

In the said scenario, the petitioners are directed to produce the

victim/ girl before

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top