SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
KACHORI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. and OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['V S KUSHWAHA', 'GOVT ADVOCATE', '', 'S P SHARMA']

Court No. - 93

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2197 of 2003

Revisionist :- Kachori

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others

Counsel for Revisionist :- V.S. Kushwaha

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,S.P.Sharma

Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

List has been revised.

None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist(s) to press this revision.

Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

Learned AGA submits that the present revision is of the year 2003 and it

appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost

interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in

the impugned judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below,

therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.

I have gone through the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s)

below and have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned

AGA. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court

pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) passed

by the court(s) below.

In view of the above, after having gone through the judgment and order(s)

under challenge, this Court comes to the conc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top