OM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
SMT INDRA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
CAPL 2353/2021
Court No. - 1
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2353
of 2021
Applicant :- Om Prakash
Opposite Party :- Smt Indra And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Bhaiya Lal Yadav,Arun Kumar
Dubey
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard Sri B.L. Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant.
It is contended that writ Court on 04.02.2003 while
entertaining the writ petition no. 4232 of 2003 filed by
opposite parties had stayed the effect and operation of
order dated 28.11.2002 passed by Deputy Director of
Consolidation. The applicant, who is respondent no. 1 in
the said writ petition filed stay vacation application along
with counter affidavit.
It is contended that the said writ petition is pending
consideration but despite the interim order the opposite
party taking advantage of the COVID-19 situation had
started raising construction over the land in dispute.
As the counter affidavit as well as stay vacation
application has already been filed by the applicant in the
said writ petition, the applicant may file application for
getting the interim order modified, but no contempt is
made out.
Recently the Apex Court in case of Vinay Kumar Pandey
vs. Committe of Management Shri Gandhi Inter
College and another, Civil Appeal Nos. 4007-4008 of
2020 (arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 14995-14996 of 2020),
decided on 08.12.2020 has held that where the stay vacation
application and counter affidavit has already been filed, no contempt
proceeding can be initiated subsequently. The operative portion
of the judgment is quoted hereasunder:-
"Without going into the issue of maintainability of the appeal before
the Division Bench of the High court, the basis facts which emerge
from the record are that the contempt alleged is of non-compliance
of the order dated 15.07.2019 which itself was an ad-interim order
and appropriate application seeking vacation of that order is still
pending consideration before the High Court.
In the circumstances, unless and until the submission raised in that
application seeking vacation is adequately addressed and rejected,
no case for initiation of contempt proceedings was made out."
In view of the dictum of the Apex Court, this contempt
petition is not maintainable and the same is hereby
dismissed.
Order Date :- 13.7.2021
V.S.Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.