ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
AJAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent
BAIL/25506/2020
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25506
of 2020
Applicant :- Ajay
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Hemant Kumar Rai
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rakesh Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
By means of this application the applicant Ajay has prayed to
release him on bail in Case Crime No. 15 of 2020, u/s 363,
366, 376, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 PASCO Act, Police Station
Patawai, District Rampur.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA
representing the State and learned counsel for the informant.
Perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is
innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this very case
crime number. Applicant is in jail since 25.02.2020 and there is
no likelihood of applicant's fleeing from course of justice or
tempering with evidence in case he is released on bail.
Prosecutrix is major. Though her date of birth given in the high
school certificate is 8.9.2002. According to it, she was above 17
years on the alleged date of occurrence. For the four days,
report was not lodged. There is variation in the statement
recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. Subsequently
statement of prosecutrix has been recorded wherein she has
narrated to be recovered from the public office. No medical
proof of date of birth is there. It was a false implication. Hence
bail has been prayed for during trial.
Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA has
vehemently opposed the bail application with this contention
that prosecutrix is minor. She was abducted and subjected to
rape by the applicant and it is very well there in the statement
recorded under Section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C.
Having heard and gone through the materiel placed on record, it
is apparent that first information report was delayed.
Prosecutrix gave two versions in her statement recorded under
Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. She was above 17 years of age.
Under all above facts and circumstances, the nature of
accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of
conviction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of
the case, this court is of the view that the applicant may be
enlarged on bail with certain conditions.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Ajay , involved in above mentioned case
crime number be released on bail on his executing a personal
bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.
2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.
3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution
witnesses and co-operate in the trial.
4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date
fixed by the trial court unless his personal appearance is
exempted through counsel by the court concerned.
In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the
court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.
Order Date :- 5.1.2021
Ravi Prakash
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.