ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BRAHM DATT TYAGI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18243 of 2022
Petitioner :- Brahm Datt Tyagi
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Sagar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar,Ravi Prakash
Pandey,Tabish Sheikh
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing
Counsel for the respondents no.1 to 4 & 7 and Sri Ravi Prakash
Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no.6.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go
to the private respondent.
The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to respondent
no.3-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, District Ghaziabad to
decide the Case No.8322 of 2020, under Section 24 of U.P.
Revenue Code, 2006 (Computer Case No.T202011280108322)
within stipulated period.
It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that since the
matter is pending consideration he is suffering irreparable loss.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present
petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the
respondent no.3 to consider and decide the aforesaid case in
acco
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.