ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DEENANATH – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/24353/2022
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24353
of 2022
Applicant :- Deenanath
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Prabodh Dubey
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the
State and perused the record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the
applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime
No.22 of 2017, under Sections 396, 412, 302, 201, 328, 364,
120-B I.P.C., P.S. Devrahat, District Kanpur Dehat, during
pendency of the trial.
It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is
innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It
is further submitted that the applicant was earlier granted bail
on 31.7.2013 by this Court. It is next submitted that the
applicant is an illetrate person and he went to Delhi for some
labour work, therefore, could not appear before the court on the
date fixed. The act of the applicant of non-appearance on dates
is not intentionally. Since the applicant did not appeared on the
date fixed, NBW was issued and he was arrested on 4.10.2021.
Since then he is in jail. It is further argued that PW1, PW2 and
PW3 have already been examined and there are chances of
early conclusion of trial. The applicant is languishing in jail
since 410.2021 and in case he is enlarged on bail he will not
misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in
view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and
without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and
the mandate laid down by the Apex Court in the case of
Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in
(2018) 3 SCC 22, the Court is of the view that the applicant has
made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Deenanath, who is involved in the aforesaid
case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal
bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction
of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further,
before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence
by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the
investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without
seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or
commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a
ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 20.6.2022
Deepika
Digitally signed by DEEPIKA SINGH
Date: 2022.06.23 14:03:57 IST
Reason:
Location: High Court of Judicature
at Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.