ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MALATI SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMAR YADAV – Respondent
Reserved on:
20.9.2022
Delivered on: 09.11.2022
Court No. - 18
“AFR”
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2691 of 2020
Petitioner :- Malati Sharma
Respondent :- Raj Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kiran Kumar Arora,Ram Akbal Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- Prakhar Tandon
Connected with
Case :- S.C.C. REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 234 of 2014
Revisionist :- Malti Sharma
Opposite Party :- Raj Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Revisionist :- S.K.Upadhyay,Kiran Kumar Arora,R.A.
Upadhayay
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Pankaj Agarwal,Prakhar Tandon
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard Sri K.K.Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri
Prakhar Tandon, learned counsel for the contesting respondents.
Both the matters arise out of same suit, therefore, are being
heard and decided together by this common judgment.
The petitioner before this Court is tenant respondent in Small
Causes Suit No. 193 of 2012, which came to be decreed dated
24.7.2019 for arrears of rent and ejectment.
The petitioner challenged the order of the Judge Small Causes
before the Additional District Judge, Court No. 2 by instituting Small
Causes Revision being No. 60 of 2019 which also came to be
dismiss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.