SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
HARI MOHAN NIRANJAN – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Court No. - 72

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No.

- 14534 of 2021

Applicant :- Hari Mohan Niranjan

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Lakshman Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.

On 1.10.2021, this Court passed the following order:-

"1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the

record.

2. The instant application is being moved by the applicant invoking the

powers of Section 438 Cr.P.C. that he has every reason to believe that he

may be arrested on the accusation of having committed a non-bailable

offence in connection with Case Crime No.845 of 2020, under Sections

420, 406 IPC, Police Station-Kotwali, District-Jalaun.

3. From the record, it is evident that the applicant has approached this

Court straightaway without getting his anticipatory bail rejected from the

court of sessions.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant has drawn attention of the Court to

Clause-7 of Section 438 Cr.P.C. (UP Act No.4 of 2019), which reads thus:

"(7) If an application under this section has been made by any person to

the High Court, no application by the same person

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top