SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AMITA GARG AND 6 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 74

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S

438 CR.P.C. No. - 5501 of 2022

Applicant :- Amita Garg And 6 Others

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Kishore Pandey,Ajay Kumar Bashist Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Hitesh Pachori

Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.

1. Heard Sri Ram Kishore Pandey, learned counsels for the

applicants and learned A.G.A for the State as well as Mr. Sayed

Abid Ali, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Hitesh Pachori, learned

counsel for the first informant.

2. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on

behalf of the applicants, Amita Garg, Vashudev Garg,

Chaitanya Garg, Radhika, Sanjay Dixit, Ashok Kumar

Tiwari and Vishan Singh, with a prayer to release them on

transit / anticipatory bail in F.I.R. No. 446 of 2022, Police

Station- Mansarovar, District- Jaipur City (South) dated

10.05.2022, under Sections- 504, 506, 384, 467, 468, 120-B

IPC, during pendency of trial.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant no. 1 at

present is aged about 58 years, the applicant nos. 2 and 3 are the

sons and the applicant no. 4 is the daughter of applicant n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top