ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
OMKAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 23
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3693 of
2018
Petitioner :- Omkar Singh
Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhila Nand Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
Heard counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has approached this Court praying for a writ of
mandamus directing respondent no. 2 to remove the illegal
encroachments made by respondent no. 4 over Plot No. 551,
which the petitioner alleges to be Gaon Sabha property.
However, from the records annexed with the writ petition, it
does not appear that the petitioner has filed any application
before the concerned Assistant Collector, even though under
Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, it is the
Assistant Collector, who is empowered to inquire into matters
relating to encroachments over Gaon Sabha property and pass
appropriate orders for removal of the said encroachments.
It would serve no purpose to keep the writ petition pending, and
therefore, it is directed that petitioner may submit a
representation before the Assistant Collector bringing the
relevant facts regarding encroachmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.