SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAMAKANT YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Court No. - 36

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8809 of 2021

Petitioner :- Ramakant Yadav

Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Srivastava

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.

Heard Shri Dharmendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for

the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State

respondent.

By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction

to the State respondents to release his pensionary benefits

forthwith and to decide his last representation dated 15.4.2021.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the

petitioner has completed requisite period of service and the

issue in question is no more res-integra in the light of judgment

and order dated 7.3.2018 passed in the case of Ishrat Jahan Vs.

State of U.P. and 3 others, Writ-A No.5737 of 2018 as well as

order dated 02.02.2021 passed in the case of Dharam Raj

Mishra vs. State of U.P. and others. He submits that the present

issue is squarely covered with the dictum of this Hon'ble Court

in Ishrat Jahan (supra) and Dharam Raj Mishra (supra),

therefore, this writ petition may be decided finally in terms of

aforesaid judgment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top