SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTH
KALYAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
ANUJ BHUSHAN MITTAL AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


RESERVED on 14.9.2021

Delivered on 5.10.2021

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10482 of 2021

Petitioner :- Kalyan Singh

Respondent :- Anuj Bhushan Mittal And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Agnivesh,Jadu Nandan Yadav

Counsel for Respondent :- Raj Kumar Kesari

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Heard Shri Agnivesh, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Shri Raj Kumar Kesari, learned counsel for

the respondents.

This writ petition has been filed praying for quashing

of the judgement and order dated 22.2.2021 passed by

District Judge, Hapur in Rent Control Appeal no. 04 of

2019 and order dated 14.8.2019 passed by the

Prescribed Authority/Civil Judge (S.D.), Ist, Hapur in P.A.

Case No. 6 of 2017(Anuj Bhushan Vs. Kalyan Singh).

The landlord /respondent filed an application under

section 21(1) (a) of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 before the

Prescribed Authority praying for release of shop no. W-

28/510 (1) Gandhi Ganj, Hapur for the need of his son

Nitesh Mittal for doing business of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top