ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAM MILAN NISHAD – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34139
of 2021
Applicant :- Ram Milan Nishad
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shivendra Raj Singhal,Manoj Kumar
Srivastava,Pramod Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the
State and perused the record.
It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that
applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this
case. It was stated that applicant was named in the F.I.R. on the
basis of statement of co-accused Ram Prakash Yadav. The
applicant was not apprehended on the spot and that alleged
liquor shop, from which spurious liquor was purchased by the
deceased persons, is of co-accused Ram Prakash Yadav and
applicant has no concern with the said shop. The only allegation
made by co-accused Ram Prakash Yadav against the applicant
is that applicant and co-accused Shiv Sevak Singh used to
cooperate him in the illegal business of spurious liquor. After
three days of incident, applicant was apprehended by the police
and that a false recovery of 9 bottles of spurious country made
liquor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.