SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA-I
DR.DEEPAK SAHA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 82

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1871 of 2021

Revisionist :- Dr.Deepak Saha

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Revisionist :- M J Akhtar,Sr. Advocate(Shri V.M.

Zaidi)

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.

The instant criminal revision has been filed by the revisionist

for setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated

25.01.2021 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Court No.3, Varanasi.

The brief facts are that the first information report No.0555 of

2016 dated 26.10.2016, under Section 66e of the Information

Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as

the "Act") was lodged against the revisionist on the basis of

written complaint given by the opposite party No.2. After

conclusion of investigation, charge sheet dated 30.03.2017,

under Section 66e of the Act has also been filed against the

revisionist. The revisionist, thereafter, moved an application

dated 20.12.2018, under Section 239 Cr.P.C. claiming discharge

which came to be rejected vide impugned order dated

25.01.2021.

Learned Senior Advocate for the revisionist has submitted that

f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top