SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAMFER AND 5 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 12 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['ASHOK KUMAR UPADHYAY', 'C S C', '', 'AMAR NATH PANDEY', 'BHUPENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI']

Court No. - 52

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1818 of 2022

Petitioner :- Ramfer And 5 Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 12 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Upadhyay

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amar Nath

Pandey,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi

Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

Vakalatnama filed by Mr. Amar Nath Pandey, Advocate, on

behalf of respondent Nos.6, 7 and 8, is taken on record.

Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Upadhyay, Counsel for the petitioners,

learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1,2, and 3, Mr.

B.K. Tripathi, Counsel for respondent No.4 and Mr. Amar Nath

Pandey for respondent Nos. 5 to 8.

Instant writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned

order dated 29.06.2022 passed by respondent No.2, Board of

Revenue at Prayagraj in Revision No.1493 of 2022

(Computerized Case No.A/20221436001493) (Ramfer and

others) under Section 210 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as well for

quashing the order dated 31.05.2022 passed by respondent No.3

Up-Ziladhikari Badlapur, Jaunpur in Suit No. 03061 of 2020

(Ramfer and others Vs. Suman Singh and others)

(Computerized Case No.T202014360203061) under Section

116 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006

Brief facts of the case are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top