ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MANISH KUMAR
DHARMENDRA TALAN – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/41271/2021
BAIL - SECTION 304 IPC - SUMMARY
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was involved in a case where the deceased was hit by a motorcycle while sitting in the gallery of her house. The applicant was driving the motorcycle. The FIR was lodged on 05.06.2021 at 02.11 hours, whereas the inquest was started on 04.06.2021 at 23.55 hours. The prosecution changed its stand at every stage, as in the hospital, Vandana (sister of the deceased) had stated that the deceased met with an accident outside the house, whereas while giving the statement to the Police under Section 161 Cr.P.C, changed the place of occurrence as well as given the name of the applicant along with other co-accused persons for killing her sister.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the inquest was made prior to lodging of the FIR. The court also found that the prosecution was changing its stand at every stage. The court also noted that the applicant was in jail since 14.07.2021.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant had made out a fit case for grant of bail. The court considered the nature of offence and totality of facts and circumstances of the case.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on furnishing personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41271 of
2021
Applicant :- Dharmendra Talan
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar,Devendra Kumar
Mishra,Preet Pal Singh Rathore
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ajay Kumar Pathak
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Preet Pal Singh Rathore, learned counsel for the
applicant, Sri Om Prakash Mishra, learned AGA for the
State and Sri Ajay Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the
complainant.
By means of this application, the applicant, who is involved
in Case Crime No. 400 of 2021, under sections 304, 34 of
the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Jewar, District-
Gautam Budh Nagar is seeking enlargement on bail during
the trial.
According to the version in the First Information
Report (hereinafter referred to as, the FIR) dated
05.06.2021 lodged at 02.11 hours by the informant is that
three accused persons had hit her daughter (Aarti) by a
motor cycle while she was sitting in a gallery of the house
due to which Aarti got grievous injuries and subsequently
succumbed to her injuries. It has also been mentioned in
the FIR that eight days ago, while Aarti was sitting at the
shop, they had made some vulgar comments, due to which
an altercation had taken place between them.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the
FIR was lodged on 05.06.2021 at 02.11 hours whereas the
inquest was started on 04.06.2021 at 23.55 hours meaning
thereby the inquest was made before lodging of the FIR.
Further submission of learned counsel for the applicant is
that the prosecution is improvising its case at every stage,
when the injured was brought to the hospital accompanied
by Vandana (sister of the deceased) informed that she met
with an accident outside the house, whereas while giving
the statement under Section 161 Cr.PC., she has narrated
almost in verbatim the narration in the FIR, lodged by the
informant i.e. father of Vandana and the deceased that the
accused persons had hit her by a motor cycle while she
was sitting in the gallery of the house. It is further
submitted that the accident had occurred and the applicant
was driving the motorcycle and the deceased was sitting
outside her house on the road, so at the most, the death
was caused by negligence and the case of the applicant
falls under Section 304-A IPC and the maximum
punishment provided is two years. It is further submitted
that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the case
and there is no occasion either to tamper or influence any
of the witnesses. It is further submitted that the applicant
has no criminal history.
On the other hand, learned AGA has opposed the prayer for
grant of bail and has submitted that from the FIR and the
previous incident, as stated in the FIR, offence is made out
against the applicant and the charge-sheet has been filed
under Section 304 IPC, where the punishment provided is
imprisonment for life or imprisonment for either description
of a term which may extend to 10 years.
After hearing the submissions made by the learned counsel
for the respective parties and examining the material
available on record, prima facie it has been found that the
inquest was made prior to lodging of the FIR. From the
record, it is revealed that the prosecution is changing her
stand at every stage, as mentioned above i.e. in the
hospital, Vandana had stated that the deceased met with
an accident outside the house and while giving the
statement to the Police under Section 161 Cr.P.C, changed
the place of occurrence as well as given the name of the
applicant along with other co-accused persons for killing
her sister. The applicant is in jail since 14.07.2021.
Keeping in view the nature of offence and totality of facts
and circumstances of the case and without entering into
the merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant
has made out a fit case for grant of bail. Hence, the bail
application is al
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.