ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SACHIN KUMAR GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 81
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23057 of 2022
Applicant :- Sachin Kumar Goyal
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Dwivedi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the impugned
summoning order dated 14.12.2021 passed by learned Presiding Officer,
Additional Court No.2, Agra in Complaint Case No. 1369 of 2019 under section
138 N.I. Act, Police Station-New Agra, District-Agra as well as the entire
proceedings of the aforesaid case.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that opposite party no.2 though has
mentioned the date on which notice was sent through his advocate but there is
no averment with respect to the date of service of notice upon the complainant,
therefore, the complaint filed on 10.10.2019 is not maintenable. Under the
circumstances, the pre-condition as contained in section 138 N.I. has remained
uncomplied with, therefore, the proceedings are clearly not maintenable under
the N.I. Act, 1881 and the same cannot continue against the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.