SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
TOTA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['SUNIL KUMAR', '', 'YOGESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA', 'GOVT ADVOCATE']

Court No. - 48

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1824 of 2007

Appellant :- Tota Ram

Respondent :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Appellant :- Sunil Kumar,Yogesh Kumar Srivastava

Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

In Re: Criminal Misc. Second Bail Application No.10 of

2022 filed on behalf of the appellant-Tota Ram

Present matter is listed under the heading "PENDING BAIL

APPLICATION IN CRIMINAL APPEALS 14 YEARS OR

MORE THAN 14 YEARS".

We have heard Shri N. Muhammad, learned counsel for the

applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for State on the bail

application.

Present bail application has been preferred for a direction to

release the appellant on bail in Sessions Trial No.994 of 1998

(State v. Tota Ram) arising out of Case Crime No.115 of 1998

under Section 302 IPC, P.S. Jewar, Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has

been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in

jail since 23.2.2007 and by now, he has already undergone more

than 15 years of sentence. He has no criminal antecedent. It is

also submitted by learned counsel for the appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top