ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PAMMI KASHYAP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27351 of 2019
Applicant :- Pammi Kashyap
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Chitranshi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amit Kumar Sharma,Rakesh
Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
Heard Sri Ashish Chitranshi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri
Rakesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for opposite party No.2,
learned A.G.A. and perused material on record.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing
entire proceeding in Criminal Complaint Case No. 1715 of 2017
(Vijay Prakash Sharma Vs. Pammi Kashyap) under Section 138 N.I.
Act, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Barielly pending in the court of Judicial
Magistrate N.I. Act, Bareilly with a further prayer to stay the aforesaid
proceedings.
When the application was entertained following order was passed by
this Court on 16.7.2019 :
"Heard Shri Ashish Chitranshi, learned counsel for the applicant and
learned A.G.A. for the State.
Present application under Section 482,Cr.P.C. has been filed by the
applicant to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.1715
of 2017, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.