SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PAMMI KASHYAP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Court No. - 92

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27351 of 2019

Applicant :- Pammi Kashyap

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Chitranshi

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amit Kumar Sharma,Rakesh

Kumar Yadav

Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.

Heard Sri Ashish Chitranshi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri

Rakesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for opposite party No.2,

learned A.G.A. and perused material on record.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing

entire proceeding in Criminal Complaint Case No. 1715 of 2017

(Vijay Prakash Sharma Vs. Pammi Kashyap) under Section 138 N.I.

Act, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Barielly pending in the court of Judicial

Magistrate N.I. Act, Bareilly with a further prayer to stay the aforesaid

proceedings.

When the application was entertained following order was passed by

this Court on 16.7.2019 :

"Heard Shri Ashish Chitranshi, learned counsel for the applicant and

learned A.G.A. for the State.

Present application under Section 482,Cr.P.C. has been filed by the

applicant to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.1715

of 2017, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top