SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
OM PRAKASH - VII
AJAY YADAV – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 53

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42871

of 2020

Applicant :- Ajay Yadav

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Nath Yadav,Akhilesh

Kumar Yadav,Swati Agrawal Srivastava

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Raghuraj Singh,Vishal

Kumar

Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.

Heard Sushri Swati Agrawal Srivastava, learned counsel for the

applicant, Shri Vishal Kumar, learned counsel for the informant

as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the

applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

present case. He has not committed the present offence. No

prima facie case is made out against the applicant. If entire

prosecution case is taken into consideration then also it is a case

of circumstantial evidence. Incident is said to have taken place

on 02.09.2020 whereas F.I.R. was lodged on 09.09.2020

without any plausible explanation regarding the delay.

Referring to the inquest report, it is further submitted that

informant is the witness of the inquest. Cause of death is shown

as accident in it. It is further submitted that after a gap of ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top