ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
OM PRAKASH - VII
AJAY YADAV – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 53
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42871
of 2020
Applicant :- Ajay Yadav
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Nath Yadav,Akhilesh
Kumar Yadav,Swati Agrawal Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Raghuraj Singh,Vishal
Kumar
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard Sushri Swati Agrawal Srivastava, learned counsel for the
applicant, Shri Vishal Kumar, learned counsel for the informant
as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the
applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the
present case. He has not committed the present offence. No
prima facie case is made out against the applicant. If entire
prosecution case is taken into consideration then also it is a case
of circumstantial evidence. Incident is said to have taken place
on 02.09.2020 whereas F.I.R. was lodged on 09.09.2020
without any plausible explanation regarding the delay.
Referring to the inquest report, it is further submitted that
informant is the witness of the inquest. Cause of death is shown
as accident in it. It is further submitted that after a gap of ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.