ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI,ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
SMT. ATA NASIBA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
1
Court No. - 40
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 1144 of 2020
Appellant :- Smt. Ata Nasiba
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Counsel for Appellant :- Javed Husain Khan,Gulrez Khan
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sant Ram Sharma
Hon'ble Munishwar Nath Bhandari,J.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
By this appeal, a challenge is made to the judgment dated 2.11.2020
by which the writ petition of the appellant was dismissed.
It is a case where a writ petition was filed erring two parties as
petitioners to challenge the order passed by the District Magistrate dated
24.7.2020. It was on an appeal by the petitioners under Rule 3-AAA (2)
(e) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947 (in short “Rules of 1947”). The
non-appellant herein raised objection on the maintainability of the writ
petition in reference to Section 72 (4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (in
short “Code of 2006”). It was precisely on the ground that the writ
petition has not been filed by Gram Sabha through a Standing Counsel
and thus not maintainable. At that stage petition was not pressed for
petitioner no.2 but pressed for petitioner no.1. The learned Single Judge
made a reference of Section 72(4) of the Cod
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.