SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JAVED KHAN – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Court No. - 67

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3446 of 2020

Appellant :- Javed Khan

Respondent :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Appellant :- Faizan Siddiqui

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

&

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3387 of 2020

Appellant :- Anmol Singh

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another

Counsel for Appellant :- Rajesh Kumar Roy Sharma,Amit Daga,Mukesh

Kumar Pandey,Tanisha Jahangir Monir,Vikram Sinha,Zia Uddin Ahmad

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

Heard Sri V.P.Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Faizan

Siddhiqui, Amit Daga, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Ghanshyam

Kumar, Satendra Nath Singh, Advocates assisted by Faraz Kazmi, learned

counsel for the State and perused the record.

Office report dated dated 08.01.2021 and 29.01.2021 indicate that relying

upon the report of CJM, Allahabad shows that the notices were duly

served upon opposite party no. 2 but opposite party no.2 neither engage

any counsel nor any counter affidavit has been filed on his behalf.

With the aid and help of learned AGA, the court is proposing to decide

both the appeal by a common order.

Pleadings between the parties have been exchanged and the matter i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top