JAVED KHAN – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3446 of 2020
Appellant :- Javed Khan
Respondent :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Appellant :- Faizan Siddiqui
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
&
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3387 of 2020
Appellant :- Anmol Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another
Counsel for Appellant :- Rajesh Kumar Roy Sharma,Amit Daga,Mukesh
Kumar Pandey,Tanisha Jahangir Monir,Vikram Sinha,Zia Uddin Ahmad
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard Sri V.P.Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Faizan
Siddhiqui, Amit Daga, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Ghanshyam
Kumar, Satendra Nath Singh, Advocates assisted by Faraz Kazmi, learned
counsel for the State and perused the record.
Office report dated dated 08.01.2021 and 29.01.2021 indicate that relying
upon the report of CJM, Allahabad shows that the notices were duly
served upon opposite party no. 2 but opposite party no.2 neither engage
any counsel nor any counter affidavit has been filed on his behalf.
With the aid and help of learned AGA, the court is proposing to decide
both the appeal by a common order.
Pleadings between the parties have been exchanged and the matter i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.