ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GULBAHAR – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40395
of 2020
Applicant :- Gulbahar
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the
State and perused the material placed on record.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that he
has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next
submitted that FIR has been lodged with the allegation that in
whatsapp group in which daughter of informant was also added,
porn vedio made viral by the applicant. It is further submitted
that during investigation, it was found that alleged porn vedio
was found deleted. Applicant is having no criminal history. He
is languishing in jail since 3.10.2020 and in case he is released
on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate
in trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail, but could not
dispute the aforesaid facts.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also
perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion
on the merit of the case, let the applicant Gulba
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.