SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SHAILESH KUMAR SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 36

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11701 of 2022

Petitioner :- Shailesh Kumar Shukla

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Nitin Chandra Mishra,Sr.

Advocate,Vibhu Rai

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avneesh Tripathi

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

Heard Sri Anoop Trivedi learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri

Nitin Chandra Mishra learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri

Manish Goyal learned Additional Advocate General assisted by

Sri A.K. Goel for the State respondents and Sri Avneesh

Tripathi learned counsel for the University.

Present writ petition has been filed to challenge the order dated

06.7.2022 whereby the petitioner has been suspended and a

disciplinary enquiry has been required to be conducted by the

Commissioner, Lucknow Division.

Submission of learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner is four

folds. First, it has been submitted that the fact allegations giving

rise to the impugned order is with respect to the functioning of

the petitioner as Vice Chancellor, Lucknow University and

Registrar Allahabad State University. The Additional Chief

Secretary Government of U.P. is not the disciplinary authority

over the Vice

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top