SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AJIT KUMAR
RAJJU YADAV – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 88

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3353 of 2020

Appellant :- Rajju Yadav

Respondent :- State Of U.P.And Another

Counsel for Appellant :- Amit Kumar Srivastava

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

Heard Sri Amit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the

appellant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the

State respondent.

This Criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,

1989 has been preferred by the appellant with the prayer to set

aside the order dated 4th November, 2020 passed by Special

Judge, SC/ ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act/ Special Judge

(D.A.A.) Act, Chitrakoot in Bail Application No.- 722 of 2020

(Rajju Yadav vs. State of U.P.) arising out of Case Crime No.-

56 of 2020 under Sections 452, 376-D, 392 I.P.C. and Sections

3(2)(V) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Police Station-

Raipura, District- Chitrakoot.

As per the allegations made in the first information report while

the informant was sleeping along with her younger sister, the

name accused person broke into the house of the informant and

not only even outraged her modesty but also tried to c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top