ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AJIT KUMAR
RAJJU YADAV – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3353 of 2020
Appellant :- Rajju Yadav
Respondent :- State Of U.P.And Another
Counsel for Appellant :- Amit Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Amit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the
appellant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the
State respondent.
This Criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
1989 has been preferred by the appellant with the prayer to set
aside the order dated 4th November, 2020 passed by Special
Judge, SC/ ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act/ Special Judge
(D.A.A.) Act, Chitrakoot in Bail Application No.- 722 of 2020
(Rajju Yadav vs. State of U.P.) arising out of Case Crime No.-
56 of 2020 under Sections 452, 376-D, 392 I.P.C. and Sections
3(2)(V) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Police Station-
Raipura, District- Chitrakoot.
As per the allegations made in the first information report while
the informant was sleeping along with her younger sister, the
name accused person broke into the house of the informant and
not only even outraged her modesty but also tried to c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.