ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Dinesh Kumar Singh, J
SALIM – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 76
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41870
of 2020
Applicant :- Salim
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Daga,Sandeep Kumar
Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri Amit Daga, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri
G. P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the
record.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that P.O.C.S.O.
Act has wrongly been imposed as the F.I.R. itself shows that the
age of the victim 19 years, hence there is no need to issue notice
to informant. Hence, this Court proceeds to heard this case on
merits.
This Bail Application (under Section 439 Cr.P.C.) has been
moved for seeking bail in Case Crime No. 358 of 2020, under
Sections 376 & 506 of I.P.C. and Sections 3/4/17 of P.O.C.S.O.
Act, P.S. Amroha Nagar, District Amroha, during pendency of
the trial.
As per F.I.R., which has been lodged by Nadeem Ahmad, it has
been stated that his daughter aged about 19 years was taken in
an uninhabited house on 01.08.2020, at about 03:00PM and was
raped by the co-accused Sabbu and videography was also done
by co-accused Gaurav and threat was also given
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.