Court No. - 36

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12544 of 2022

Petitioner :- Pratibha Srivastava

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Gautam Baghel

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avneesh Tripathi

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

Heard Sri Gautam Baghel, learned counsel for the petitioner,

learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri

Shikhar Tandon, holding brief of Sri Avneesh Tripathi, learned

counsel for the University.

Challenge has been raised to the order dated 27.5.2022 passed

by Special Secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh, whereby

the petitioner's claim for pension has been rejected.

Upon perusal of elaborate impugned order, it transpires that

reasoning to reject the claim is wording of the order dated

18.7.1992. It has been relied to conclude, the petitioner was not

regularized.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having

perused the record, it transpires, the petitioner was originally

engaged on ad hoc basis on the post of Steno-typist in the year

1982 against the appointment order dated 3.6.1982. With

respect to claim of the pension petitioner relied on further order

dated 18.7.1992 issued by Director, Ha