SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SHIVAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['JATA SHANKAR PANDEY', 'G A', '', 'ASHISH PANDEY']

A.F.R.

Court No. - 86

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19621 of 2021

Applicant :- Shivam Singh

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Jata Shankar Pandey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ashish Pandey

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

Heard Sri Jata Shankar Pandey, learned counsel for the

applicant, Sri Ashish Pandey appearing for NCB as well as Sri

Rajeshwar Singh, Rakesh Chand Srivastava, Sri Amit Sinha,

learned A.G.A. assisted by Rajnish Pandey and Sri Madnesh

Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer for the State and

perused the record.

The present application has been filed for quashing the order

dated 4.9.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.

10, Allahabad in N.C.R. No. UPAD-01007233/2021

(State/NCB Vs. Vinod Yadav), under sections 8/20 N.D.P.S.

Act, arsing out of Case Crime no. 188 of 2021, Police Station

Shankargarh, District Prayagraj.

Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the vehicle

bearing registration No. UP62 AT8908 belongs to the applicant

and no useful purpose would be served in keeping the vehicle at

police station which would result in the vehicle becoming junk.

Learned counsel for the applica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top